Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221513›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scalp block improves electrophysiological stability and patient cooperation during deep brain stimulation surgery.

Sining Xie, Yan Liu, Anchao Yang, Fangang Meng, Chenguan Jiang, Huaying Fang, Ruquan Han, Jianguo Zhang, Lin Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sining Xie *Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Yan Liu *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Anchao YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Fangang MengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Chenguan JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Huaying FangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Theory and Technology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Ruquan HanDepartment of Anesthesia, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China. ruquan.han@ccmu.edu.cn.
Jianguo ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China. zjguo73@126.com.
Lin ShiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China. shilin@mail.ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of special funding support YGLX202321Beijing Natural Science Foundation JQ23038Bethune Charitable Foundation bnmr-2023-009National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a critical intervention for various neurological disorders. While effective, the traditional local infiltration anesthesia used in DBS surgeries often hinders electrophysiological recording quality and patient cooperativeness. The research aims to evaluate the impact of local infiltration versus scalp block anesthetic methods on electrophysiological signal quality and patient cooperativeness during DBS surgeries. This study involved patients who participated in an intraoperative task during the bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS surgery for Parkinson's Disease between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. Patients were either administered the traditional local infiltration anesthesia or the modified scalp block anesthesia. Intraoperative electrophysiological recording data and anesthetic data was collected. Spike sorting was performed to evaluate the recording stability. Patient cooperativeness and intraoperative experience was assessed and compared. The patients under scalp block anesthesia exhibited shorter pre-acquisition time, longer stable recording time, higher number of tasks per site, higher number of neurons recorded per task (all ps < 0.05). In behavior, patients under scalp block anesthesia showed higher accuracy in tasks (p < 0.05), while the response time was comparable. The overall satisfaction of anesthesia was also higher in scalp block, as revealed by the visual analogue scale, Likert scale and mean arterial pressure (all ps < 0.05). The modified scalp block anesthetic method offers considerable advantages over traditional local infiltration anesthesia in DBS surgeries. It helps to improve both patient comfort and cooperation during the surgery, and thereby enhancing the overall quality of neurological data and efficacy of DBS procedures.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalDeep Brain StimulationNerve BlockParkinson DiseaseScalpAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubthalamic NucleusDeep brain stimulationElectrophysiological signal stabilityIntraoperative cooperativenessLocal infiltration anesthesia.Scalp block anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40221513
PMCPMC11993571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.