ArticleScientific reports2025
Applying neural networks as direct controllers in position and trajectory tracking algorithms for holonomic UAVs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fuzzy logic based nonlinear blending hybrid control of a kestrel-inspired ornithopter operating in sinusoidal and dryden gusts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares different neural networks as standalone control algorithms for position and trajectory tracking in holonomic UAVs, specifically quadcopters. The research's novelty lies in applying these algorithms directly for control. A position-tracking algorithm based on the artificial potential field method generated extensive training and validation datasets, simulating the tracked point's diverse trajectory shapes and velocities. The most popular neural network architectures were evaluated on the basis of their trajectory tracking accuracy and computational performance, i.e. single-layer regression networks and double-layer perceptron regression networks, deep neural networks, and residual networks. The results highlight that DNNs achieved the highest trajectory tracking accuracy, as measured by root mean squared errors (1.0830) and correlation coefficients (0.9624 given as Pearson's correlation) while providing satisfactory results and stable flight across untrained scenarios, in opposite to other neural networks. However, simpler architectures, such as single-layer perceptrons, exhibit significantly lower latency, making them suitable for real-time applications despite slightly reduced accuracy. In contrast, ResNet architectures underperformed in terms of accuracy and latency, emphasizing the importance of selecting architectures on the basis of specific control objectives. This study demonstrates that deep neural networks can directly control quadcopters, eliminating the need for conventional control algorithms for UAV position-tracking applications, provided sufficient learning data is available. The proposed approach ensures accurate trajectory tracking, effectively handling sudden turns while maintaining stable flight. These findings highlight the potential of neural networks for UAV control, balancing computational efficiency with high precision and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.