ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical and prognostic factors guiding diagnosis and treatment of prostate diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical presentations, treatment strategies, and prognostic factors for prostate diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), aiming to improve patient management and outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of four prostate DLBCL cases treated at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between 2014 and 2024, integrating these findings with data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) dataset (2000-2021) to provide a broader context. All four patients underwent thorough diagnostic evaluations, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed their diagnoses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis were applied to the SEER dataset to assess overall survival and treatment efficacy. P-values below 0.05 considered statistically significant. All four patients were diagnosed with prostate DLBCL via biopsy and confirmed by IHC, with extraprostatic involvement in three cases. Two patients achieved complete response, and one had partial response. In the SEER database, Kaplan-Meir analysis found that 59 patients had a 5-year survival rate of 59 months when it dropped in half, while multi-variable Cox regression highlighted age (HR 10.45, p < 0.001), surgery (HR 0.38, p = 0.0292), and radiation (HR 0.35, p = 0.0212) as the survival predictors. Although chemotherapy was administered in clinical practice, its impact was not statistically significant in our analysis. Prostate DLBCL is aggressive with diverse clinical presentations, making early detection and personalized treatment essential. Surgery and radiotherapy significantly improve patient outcomes, but the prognostic impact of chemotherapy, despite its widespread use, requires further validation through clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.