ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid model combining environmental analysis and machine learning for predicting AI education quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the evolution of the management system of educational institutions, the need to use artificial intelligence-based tools in the university is felt more and more. Therefore, platforms based on artificial intelligence (AI) are getting more developed day by day. Therefore, in this study, firstly, by dividing the macro environment into three different parts, including external, intermediate, and internal, a set of corrective measures in the university teaching and learning management in the background of AI education is proposed, and also the effects of their application in the management of teaching and learning in universities were discussed. Also, in order to evaluate the quality of AI training programs in higher education, a new approach based on the multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm was presented in which the capuchin search algorithm (CapSA) was used to adjust the weight vector of the neural network. According to the results, Proposed and ANN (SCG) models had the best and worst performance respectively in reproducing observations. The results showed that corrective measures in all environments can help the development of AI education in universities. The results of conducting a case study and examining various evaluation indicators showed that the proposed approach in this study has a good accuracy in predicting the target variable (quality of education). The values of CCC, SROCC, PLCC and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.