ArticleScientific reports2025
Automatic measurement of proximal femoral morphological parameters using point cloud semantic segmentation technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Case for Interpretable Geometry: Statistical Shape Models vs. Curvature-Based Descriptors in Aortic Disease Classification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a method for the automatic measurement of proximal femoral morphological parameters based on CT images. First, construct a statistical model of the femur with generalization properties and perform Mask labeling. Second, automatically segment the femur model from CT images to obtain the femur sample to be tested. Then, use the GBCPD point cloud registration algorithm to complete a fast hierarchical registration between the two models, establishing point-to-point correspondences. Based on these correspondences and femoral morphological features, automatically segment the test femur sample into the shaft, neck, and head. Numerical methods are used to determine the femoral shaft axis (using PCA combined with least-squares cylinder fitting), the femoral head center and radius (least-squares sphere fitting), as well as the eccentricity and femur length. We conducted reproducibility tests of this method on 213 femurs and compared the results between automatic segmentation/measurement and manual segmentation/measurement. The Dice similarity coefficients for the femoral head, neck, and shaft reached 0.98, 0.95, and 0.99, respectively. The reproducibility errors of the anatomical standards (angles, dimensions) for automatic measurement were all lower than the errors between manual measurements, indicating that the parameter values obtained by this method exhibit good consistency with the corresponding parameter values manually identified by medical experts in the original CT images. This effectively minimizes subjective influences and can assist orthopedic surgeons in large-scale measurement analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.