ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2025
Refining microbiome diversity analysis by concatenating and integrating dual 16S rRNA amplicon reads.
Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral and plasma microbiome in the context of acute febrile illness.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the role of human gut microbiota in health and disease requires insights into its taxonomic composition and functional capabilities. This study evaluates whether concatenating paired-end reads enhances data output for gut microbiome analysis compared to the merging approach across various regions of the 16S rRNA gene. We assessed this approach in both mock communities and Korean cohorts with or without ulcerative colitis. Our results indicate that using the direct joining method for the V1-V3 or V6-V8 regions improves taxonomic resolution compared to merging paired-end reads (ME) in post-sequencing data. While predicting microbial function based on 16S rRNA sequencing has inherent limitations, integrating sequencing reads from both the V1-V3 and V6-V8 regions enhanced functional predictions. This was confirmed by whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) of Korean cohorts, where our approach improved taxa detection that was lost using the ME method. Thus, we propose that the integrated dual 16S rRNA sequencing technique serves as a valuable tool for microbiome research by bridging the gap between amplicon sequencing and WMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.