ArticleScientific reports2025
Cortico force coherence of the finger and toe with slight rhythmic pressure on force sensors using electroencephalography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the usefulness of cortico-force coherence (CFC) between electroencephalography (EEG) and force signals for assessing sensorimotor cortex function. Fourteen healthy participants performed slight rhythmical pressing with the right finger and right toe at a self-paced rate of 1-3 Hz under the active condition of CFC using a force sensor and electromyography (EMG). For passive CFC, the experimenter pressed the participant's right finger at a rate similar to that in the active condition. As control, the conventional corticokinematic coherence (CKC) was recorded for the right finger using an accelerometer (ACC). We also recorded CFC in the active condition by pressing the right toe. In all participants, coherence spectra between the 32-channel EEG signals and force, ACC, and EMG signals showed significant peaks (P < 0.01) at the movement frequency peaks or their harmonics. Finger CFC peak value did not differ among the three conditions (active CFC, passive CFC, and CKC). Finger CFC, force sensor, and EMG values showed no differences. Additionally, finger CFC did not significantly differ from toe CFC. The CFC approach with EEG appears promising and useful for the functional assessment of the sensorimotor cortex, with a clinical advantage of conducting measurements using less force and without obvious kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.