ArticleScientific data2025
TRUSTED: The Paired 3D Transabdominal Ultrasound and CT Human Data for Kidney Segmentation and Registration Research.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-platform integration of robotic intraoperative ultrasound using system-agnostic drop-in probes: technical feasibility and workflow standardization.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-modal image registration (IMIR) and image segmentation with abdominal Ultrasound (US) data have many important clinical applications, including image-guided surgery, automatic organ measurement, and robotic navigation. However, research is severely limited by the lack of public datasets. We propose TRUSTED (the Tridimensional Renal Ultra Sound TomodEnsitometrie Dataset), comprising paired transabdominal 3DUS and CT kidney images from 48 human patients (96 kidneys), including segmentation, and anatomical landmark annotations by two experienced radiographers. Inter-rater segmentation agreement was over 93% (Dice score), and gold-standard segmentations were generated using the STAPLE algorithm. Seven anatomical landmarks were annotated, for IMIR systems development and evaluation. To validate the dataset's utility, 4 competitive Deep-Learning models for kidney segmentation were benchmarked, yielding average DICE scores from 79.63% to 90.09% for CT, and 70.51% to 80.70% for US images. Four IMIR methods were benchmarked, and Coherent Point Drift performed best with an average Target Registration Error of 4.47 mm and Dice score of 84.10%. The TRUSTED dataset may be used freely to develop and validate segmentation and IMIR methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.