ArticleBehavioural brain research2025
Age and sex independently influence safety learning in mice.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety learning during adolescence facilitates fear regulation in adult mice.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Difficulty discriminating between threat and safety cues is a hallmark symptom of many fear-related disorders including anxiety, which are highly prevalent during adolescence. Moreover, females are disproportionately affected by fear and anxiety disorders. Correspondingly, growing evidence suggests that sex differences in fear responding and regulation are readily apparent in adults. Yet, it remains unclear when these differences emerge throughout development and what behavioral factors may drive them. Using adult (postnatal day/PND 69-128) and adolescent (PND 29-34) mice, we set out to study age and sex differences in learning about cues explicitly indicating safety (i.e., safety learning). Our results revealed that female mice of both ages froze more and discriminated less than males of both ages during initial discriminative conditioning. All mice showed evidence of conditioned inhibition during a summation test, though the magnitude of suppression was smaller in females. During an expanded summation test that included novel cues and different combinations of stimulus parameters, females of both ages exhibited higher fear generalization to novel cues. In addition, adolescents of both sexes failed to inhibit fear using a safety cue, suggesting that adolescent learning may be disrupted by complex experimental design. Finally, neural activity (cFos expression) was greater in the prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus of adolescents relative to adults, and the retrosplenial cortex and ventral hippocampus of males relative to females. Together, these findings illustrate the potential to take age and sex into account in the identification and treatment of fear and anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.