Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40220900›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025

Automatic failure mode evaluation using non-linear phase contrast correction to improve flow measurement accuracy in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Ana Beatriz Solana, Savine C S Minderhoud, Piotr A Wielopolski, Juan Antonio Hernandez-Tamames, Ricardo P J Budde, Willem A Helbing, Martin A Janich, Alexander Hirsch

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Beatriz SolanaASL Europe, GE HealthCare, Munich, Germany.
Savine C S MinderhoudDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Piotr A WielopolskiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Juan Antonio Hernandez-TamamesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Imaging Physics Department, Applied Physics Faculty, TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands.
Ricardo P J BuddeDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Willem A HelbingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin A JanichASL Europe, GE HealthCare, Munich, Germany.
Alexander HirschDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.hirsch@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is clinically used to quantify flow. The quantification accuracy is diminished by background phase errors. Image-based background phase correction algorithms are commercially available, but their accuracy is still under evaluation. Here, we validate a recently developed non-linear phase contrast correction (nPCcor) algorithm that includes automatic failure mode classification in a large single-vendor multi-scanner retrospective study.

methodsThree hundred forty-six through-plane PC images at the aortic valve (AAo) and pulmonary artery (PA) were acquired on three different GE HealthCare 1.5T clinical MRI scanners. Each PC scan was repeated on a static phantom, and the static phantom-corrected PC series was considered as the reference standard. Two image-based static tissue background phase corrections were applied on each PC series: a linear and the nPCcor. Accuracy of nPCcor was studied by comparing the net flow in the vessel of interest for the uncorrected, linear-corrected, and nPCcor images with respect to the static phantom-corrected series. Accuracy was defined as a difference in net flow ≤10% with respect to the static phantom corrected net flow.

resultsFlow measurements using the nPCcor images after nPCcor automatic classification were found to be accurate for 87% (281/323) of PC datasets, 6% and 17% better than using uncorrected and linear-corrected (p<0.05), respectively. Most importantly, nPCcor was able to correctly identify 70% (16/23) PC cases likely to provide inaccurate flow measurements. Flow measurements after nPCcor in the scanner with the largest phase offsets were found to be accurate for 74% (62/84) of PC datasets, 22% better than using the uncorrected images (p<0.05). nPCcor correction was statistically significant more accurate than linear correction for all scanners (p<0.05). The percentage of regurgitation reclassification of ≥1 category decreased to 8% (8/323) after nPCcor correction, 3% better than for uncorrected images.

conclusionnPCcor with automatic failure mode evaluation improved accuracy with respect to no correction and linear correction and successfully identified PC scans that are likely to result in unreliable flow measurements. nPCcor performance and phase offset errors varied greatly among scanners using the same CMR protocol. nPCcor has higher impact in scanners exhibiting the largest background phase offsets.

trial registrationobservational study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAortic ValveImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPulmonary ArteryAutomationBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansMaleNonlinear DynamicsPhantoms, ImagingPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood FlowReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesBackground phase correctionMagnetic resonance imagingPhase contrast velocity imagingStatic phantom

Identifiers

PMID40220900
PMCPMC12182816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.