ReviewJournal of advanced research2026
Engineered 3D mesenchymal stem cell aggregates with multifunctional prowess for bone regeneration: Current status and future prospects.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light-Switched Mesenchymal Stem Cells for In Situ Exosome Amplification in Craniofacial Bone Defect Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Engineering Approaches to Modify Immunomodulatory Functions of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs): Tissue Regeneration and Clinical Application.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Piezo1 mediated scaffold-free rapid generation of self-mineralized bone organoids via activating Wnt signaling.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- FOXJ3 drives mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation via the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway: A novel regulator implicated in osteoporosis.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Engineering human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell aggregates for enhanced extracellular vesicle secretion in a vertical-wheel bioreactor.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpaired efficacy of in vitro expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is a universal and thorny situation, which cast a shadow on further clinical translation of exogenous MSCs. Moreover, the relatively lengthy healing process, host metabolic heterogeneity and the sophisticated cell recognition and crosstalk pose rigorous challenges towards MSC-based bone regeneration strategies. Three-dimensional (3D) cell aggregates facilitate more robust intercellular communications and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions, providing a better mimicry of microarchitectures and biochemical milieus in vivo, which is conducive for stemness maintenance and downstream bone formation. AIM OF REVIEW: This review enunciates the phenotypic features of MSCs in aggregates, which deepens the knowledge of the MSC fate determination in 3D microenvironment. By summarizing current empowerment methods and biomaterial-combined techniques for establishing functionalized MSC aggregates, this review aims to spark innovative and promising solutions for exalting the translational value of MSCs and improve their therapeutic applications in bone tissue repair. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: 3D aggregates optimize regenerative behaviors of in vitro cultured MSCs including cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, pluripotency and immunoregulation capacity, etc. Biomaterials hybridization endows MSC aggregates with tailored mechanical and biological properties, which offers more possibilities in adapting various clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.