Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40220514›Full record

ArticleHearing research2025

Associations between physiological indicators of cochlear deafferentation and listening effort in military Veterans with normal audiograms.

Naomi F Bramhall, Brad N Buran, Garnett P McMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond standard audiometry: Auditory dysfunction and steroid treatment outcomes in young adults following acoustic trauma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi F BramhallVA RRD&T National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road/P5, Portland, OR 97239, United States; Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, MC L335A, Portland, OR 97239, United States. Electronic address: naomi.bramhall@va.gov.
Brad N BuranOregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, MC L335A, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Garnett P McMillanVA RRD&T National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road/P5, Portland, OR 97239, United States.

Funding

Mouse, Man, and Machine: Combining Model Systems to Develop a Biomarker for Cochlear Deafferentation in Humans (Administrative Supplement)R01DC020423 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Naomi Bramhall · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020423RRD VA #C2361C/I50 RX002361RRD VA #C3804-R/I01RX003804RRD VA I01 RX003127RRD VA I01 RX003804RRD VA I50 RX002361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear synaptopathy, a type of cochlear deafferentation that impacts the synapses between the inner hair cells and the afferent auditory nerve fibers, is predicted to result in speech perception in noise difficulty. However, this has been difficult to confirm due to mixed findings in human studies of the relationship between speech perception in noise and physiological indicators of deafferentation (auditory brainstem response [ABR] wave I amplitude, envelope following response [EFR] magnitude, and middle ear muscle reflex [MEMR] magnitude). One possible explanation for the mixed findings is that some listeners with cochlear deafferentation can increase their cognitive effort to compensate for the degraded speech signal so that their speech-in-noise performance is relatively unaffected, obscuring the relationship between deafferentation and speech-in-noise scores. In a population at high risk for noise-induced cochlear deafferentation (military Veterans with normal audiograms), this study evaluated the relationship between physiological indicators of deafferentation (ABR, EFR, and MEMR) and listening effort, as indicated by pupil dilation during a speech-in-noise task. Mean reductions in ABR, EFR, and MEMR magnitude were associated with greater task-related pupil dilation, but not with reduced speech-in-noise performance, although only the ABR was statistically significant after accounting for sex and outer hair cell function. This suggests that cochlear deafferentation may result in increased listening effort during speech-in-noise perception, even if performance on the task is not negatively impacted. The observed relationship between EFR magnitude and pupil dilation was non-linear, suggesting that increased listening effort may only occur after a particular threshold level of deafferentation is reached.

Indexed as

CochleaHearingHearing Loss, Noise-InducedSpeech PerceptionVeteransAcoustic StimulationAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdEar, MiddleEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseCochlear degenerationCochlear synaptopathyHidden hearing lossListening effortPupillometrySpeech in noise perception

Identifiers

PMID40220514
PMCPMC12052489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.