SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2025
Treating or tolerating persistent subretinal fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of visual and anatomical outcomes with anti-VEGF therapy.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab on refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe management of persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) varies, with no comprehensive review of outcomes from different treatment approaches. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of interventions for managing persistent SRF in nAMD patients.
methodsUsing a structured search strategy, a systematic review examined anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments for nAMD with persistent SRF. After removing duplicates, 861 articles were screened, 255 underwent full-text review, and 19 met the eligibility criteria.
resultsThe included studies demonstrated variable outcomes regarding the management of persistent SRF in nAMD. Several studies supported tolerating SRF, showing no significant difference in visual acuity between patients with and without persistent SRF. Conversely, some studies advocated for more aggressive treatment, demonstrating a significant reduction in SRF and potential visual benefits. Patients with SRF generally have better visual outcomes compared to those with intraretinal fluid or cysts. High-frequency anti-VEGF regimens, especially with aflibercept, reduce SRF and maintain visual acuity. However, less aggressive protocols achieve stable outcomes with fewer injections.
conclusionPersistent SRF in nAMD does not necessarily lead to worse visual outcomes. Standardized protocols and further research are needed to improve management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40220174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.