Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40220161›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Management of sustainable urban green spaces through machine learning-supported MCDM and GIS integration.

Murat Başeğmez, Ayhan Doğan, Cevdet Coşkun Aydın

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Murat BaşeğmezDepartment of Geographic Information System and Real Estate, Ministry of National Education, 06560, Beşevler, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ayhan DoğanDepartment of Computer Technologies, Başkent OSB Vocational Higher School of Technical Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06909, Sincan, Ankara, Türkiye.
Cevdet Coşkun AydınDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, Hacettepe University, 06800, Beytepe, Ankara, Türkiye. ceaydin@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-6936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates green space suitability in İzmir's Konak district using the analytic hierarchy process, machine learning, weighted linear combination, and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution methods, integrated with geographic information systems. The approach enhances reliability in green space identification by ensuring consistent integration of weights determined by different methods. Machine learning enables dynamic adjustments to criterion weights, yielding the best results with the random forest algorithm. The analysis revealed that 75% of green spaces were sub-optimally located, with optimal zones in the western and northern regions. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution methodology prioritized area ZGS_6 as the most suitable area, while ZGS_4 ranked lowest. This method supports efficient resource allocation and improves budgeting processes. Hence, the integration of multi-criteria decision-making and machine learning with geographic information systems enhances the planning of sustainable cities and offers critical insights to decision-makers who prioritize sustainability and livability.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGeographic Information SystemsMachine LearningAlgorithmsCitiesAnalytic hierarchy processGeographic information systemsGreen space suitabilityMachine learningTechnique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutionWeighted linear combination

Identifiers

PMID40220161
PMCPMC12049405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.