ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
A pilot study of morphological features of the eyelid margin with conjunctival goblet cells and MUC5AC in tear film of dry eye.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lid wiper epitheliopathy: an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the morphological features of eyelid margin in dry eye patients and determine their correlations with conjunctival goblet cells, MUC5AC secretion, and clinical tests of tear film.
methodsPatients diagnosed with dry eye disease (DED) were asked to complete the evaluations of symptoms and signs of dry eye, including Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Lipid layer thickness (LLT), partial blinking (PB) rate, tear-film breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer's I test (SIt), and meiboscore. Marx line (ML), lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE), and meibomian orifices (MOs) were used as indicators of morphological features of the eyelid margin. PAS staining of conjunctival goblet cells and MUC5AC measurement of the tear samples were also performed.
resultsA total of 30 patients diagnosed with DED were included. The ML score was correlated with the SIt. The MOs showed a significant negative correlation with the TBUT and LLT. The LWE was corrected to TBUT and meiboscore, and also associated with decreased conjunctival goblet cell density and MUC5AC concentration in the tear film rather than ML and MOs in the eyelid margin of dry eye patients. The tear MUC5AC concentration had a significant positive correlation with conjunctival goblet cell density.
conclusionThe eyelid margin is crucial for maintaining the integrity of tear film and ocular surface. Attracting more attention to the eyelid margin is beneficial to routine clinical practice, and lid wipers could be used to evaluate the secretion of MUC5AC in the tear film secreted by conjunctival goblet cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40220145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.