ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Aspects of triage for infants: a narrative review.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Should we leave paediatric emergency triage to artificial intelligence? A comparison of ChatGPT 4o and Grok 3.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infants under 1 year old frequently visit the general practitioner with acute illnesses. Assessing the severity of illness in this group can be challenging as signs and symptoms may be observed in both sick and healthy infants. Current triage systems are primarily designed for older children and adults and have been validated mainly in high-prevalence settings, such as emergency departments. As a result, these systems often result in undertriage, which can lead to delayed treatment and adverse outcomes.
conclusionThis review reports the existing triage and scoring systems, currently used in infants. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this systems. Furthermore, we explore how the integration of clinical features with vital signs, such as heart rate and oxygen saturation, can improve the accuracy of triage for infants. The BabyCheck, validated for use in primary care for infants under 6 months of age, and the use of pulse oximetry offer promising improvements. Further research is essential to develop and validate an optimal triage system for infants under one year of age in the general practitioner setting. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Current triage systems are widely used in emergency departments but show limitations, especially when applied to infants. • These existing triage systems often result in undertriage or overtriage, which can lead to either unnecessary healthcare utilization or delayed treatment for serious conditions. WHAT IS NEW: • Combining vital signs such as heart rate and oxygen saturation with clinical features, may improve the accuracy of triage systems for infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.