ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Co-designing 'gene', a smartphone app for genetics education and empowerment with and for the British Pakistani community: a methodological summary of the GENE-Ed project.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA lack of culturally appropriate genetic information prevents the British Pakistani community from engaging with genetic services. The GENE-Ed project focussed on the development of an educational app with and for the Pakistani community. A secondary aim was understanding how to engage the community in research.
methodsWe used an iterative co-design and co-creation approach including four phases to develop the Gene app. Phase 1 included seven interviews with community members to explore genetics understanding and define the requirements. Phase 2 included reviewing smartphone apps and research on digital patient-facing interventions for genetics understanding. Phase 3 included developing the app and obtaining initial feedback. In Phase 4, feedback was obtained from five community members using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a bespoke survey and observations.
resultsFour themes were identified in the interviews: current awareness of genetics; consanguinity, religion and cultural influence; presenting genetics information in a new digital resource and dissemination; information-sharing and uptake. The reviews highlighted an absence of culturally sensitive, accessible and evidence-based digital resources. Initial feedback included altering the animations and images within the app and simplifying the text. The mean SUS score was 87, indicating excellent usability. The written information, animations and videos were acceptable to participants, and they tended to trust the information in the app. During feedback, community members responded well to different methods but struggled with written open-ended survey questions.
conclusionThe co-design approach was essential to developing an acceptable resource for the British Pakistani community. Future clinical testing is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.