Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40220098›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Imaging Synapse Ultrastructure and Organization with STED Microscopy.

Marta Maglione, Stephan J Sigrist

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta MaglioneInstitute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan J SigristInstitute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. stephan.sigrist@fu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the localization of proteins within a cell and their possible interactions is highly relevant to understand their functionality. Nevertheless, subcellular structures of interest in neurobiology, most importantly synapses with their pre- and postsynaptic compartments, are usually smaller than the resolution limit of conventional light microscopy. Indeed, diffraction of light limits to roughly half of the wavelength of light the resolution of a conventional light microscope. In this regard, super-resolution light microscopy (SRLM) techniques have emerged, achieving even more than ten times the resolution of conventional light microscopy, thus allowing to resolve subsynaptic structures also in situ. Importantly, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy has been extensively used to image in situ the nanoscale organization of presynaptic compartments, such as the area of the presynaptic plasma membrane where synaptic vesicles fuse to release neurotransmitters, the so-called active zone. In this article, we outline a method to determine the localization of active zone scaffolding key players relative to voltage-gated calcium channels within the presynaptic active zone by time-gated STED (gSTED) microscopy in situ.

Indexed as

MicroscopySynapsesAnimalsMicroscopy, FluorescencePresynaptic TerminalsSynaptic VesiclesActive zoneBrain slicesCav2.1gSTEDMossy fiberRIM1Super-resolutionSynapse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.