ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2025
Is computed tomography assessment of residual arterial pedicle length following colorectal cancer surgery a useful marker of surgical quality?
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn vivo residual arterial pedicle length (RAPL) has been proposed as a quality indicator for central vascular ligation (CVL [i.e., RAPL ≤ 10 mm]) in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, its survival association in non-routine CVL practice requires clarification. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of measuring RAPL alongside its oncological associations in non-routine CVL surgery.
methodsA prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital was conducted on anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH) patients with stage I to III CRC (1995-2019). Using surveillance computed tomography (CT), RAPL of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) or ileo-colic artery (ICA) pedicle was measured independently by two observers. The intra-class correlation coefficient assessed the reproducibility of the measurements. Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox regression analyses estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), while univariate and multivariate linear regression models tested correlations between RAPL and clinicopathological features.
resultsA total of 1425 patients underwent a CRC operation. Post-operative CTs were reviewed in 424 patients, with 422 (mean age 69.0 years [SD 12.3]; 54.0% males) RAPLs measured. The majority studied underwent an AR (59.2%). Excellent inter-rater reliability was noted in AR (ICC = 0.97; P < 0.001) and RH (ICC = 0.89; P < 0.001) patients. No association was observed between RAPL and OS or DFS in either group. Also, RAPL lacked association with nodal harvest in either AR (P = 0.54) or RH (P = 0.16) patients.
conclusionThe value of RAPL as a quality marker of CRC surgery in non-routine CVL practice has not been confirmed. Furthermore, its lack of association with nodal harvest emphasizes the importance and the need for comprehensive pathology examination of the specimen following resection of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.