ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Dynamically Adjusting Intertemporal Choice Task in Rodents.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal discounting refers to the tendency for immediate rewards over delayed ones, assessed through intertemporal choice tasks where subjects choose between immediate low-value or delayed high-value rewards. Traditional rodent tasks often require extensive pre-task training, introducing species-specific biases and thus lower translational utility. We present a novel dynamically adjusting intertemporal choice task, where the delay for a large reward adjusts trial-by-trial based on prior choices. Choosing the large reward increases its delay by 500 ms, while selecting the small reward decreases the large reward delay by 500 ms. In eight Long-Evans rats tested across 50 days, key behavioral measures stabilized early, including the average delay and preference for the large reward. However, training enhanced behavioral flexibility, allowing rats to optimize rewards over time. This task enables rapid assessment of delay preferences while also revealing cognitive flexibility, offering significant advantages for investigating decision-making that may be relevant to real-world behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.