Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40219904›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2025

"All You Can Do is What You Know to Do": Naloxone Knowledge and Uncertainty Among People Who Use Drugs in Maryland amid a Volatile Drug Market.

Laura N Sisson, Abigail K Winiker, Tricia Triece, Richard S Rousch, Saba Rouhani, Jill Owczarzak, Susan G Sherman, Kristin E Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura N SissonDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-8150
Abigail K WinikerDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tricia TrieceDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Richard S RouschDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4365-5299
Saba RouhaniDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Jill OwczarzakDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Susan G ShermanDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kristin E SchneiderDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
Integrating data for causal inference in behavioral healthT32MH122357 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rashelle Jean Musci, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH122357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based distribution of naloxone has continued to serve as an important strategy in combatting the U.S. opioid overdose crisis. People who use drugs are first responders in this crisis, administering and disseminating knowledge about naloxone among their social networks. However, it is unclear how knowledge of naloxone evolves over time and across individuals, especially amid a volatile, unregulated drug market.

objectivesWe conducted 22 qualitative interviews with people who use drugs in rural, suburban, and urban regions of Maryland. Interviews focused on respondents' experiences witnessing and experiencing overdose, reversing overdoses with naloxone, and sources of uncertainty in overdose response.

resultsParticipants demonstrated high willingness and capacity to respond to overdose using naloxone. However, limited technical knowledge about naloxone contributed to riskier overdose reversal strategies, especially among individuals who had not received formal training. Non-naloxone reversal strategies, such as rescue breathing, were not widely used by participants. Finally, perceived volatility within local drug markets, specifically fentanyl analogues and xylazine, undermined participants' confidence in the effectiveness of naloxone.

conclusionPeople who use drugs serve an important role in community-based overdose reversal. Leveraging their experiential knowledge of overdose with technical knowledge of naloxone is foundational to effective community-based naloxone dissemination. Harm reduction programs should ensure that educational materials describe technical aspects of overdose response in ways that are intuitive to the experiences of people who use drugs, as well as ensure materials are responsive to an evolving drug supply.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMarylandMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUncertaintyYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsfentanylNaloxoneoverdosequalitativexylazine

Identifiers

PMID40219904
PMCPMC12199276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.