Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40219718›Full record

ArticleChild development

Children's Developing Understanding of the Value of Disagreement for Learning.

Ashley Ransom, Kirsten H Blakey, Samuel Ronfard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley RansomUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kirsten H BlakeyUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Samuel RonfardUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-0514

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 435-2021-0170University of Toronto Mississauga Research and Scholarly Activity Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Do children and adults recognize the value of disagreement for learning? Across two preregistered studies (data collected 2023), 4- to 8-year-old children (N = 200, 101 females, mixed ethnicities) and adults (N = 200, 99 females, mixed ethnicities) were asked whether a protagonist would learn more by talking to someone who agrees or disagrees with them about different beliefs. Across studies, participants more often endorsed learning from someone who disagreed with the protagonist when no "correct" answer existed, that is, when beliefs concerned preferences or ambiguous situations, or when the protagonist did not hold the typically "correct" belief. Adults endorsed learning from disagreement and articulated why disagreement is helpful for learning more often than children.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentComprehensionLearningSocial PerceptionAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdisagreementintellectual humilitysocial learning

Identifiers

PMID40219718
PMCPMC12208004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.