Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40219682›Full record

ArticleChild development

Children's Trait Inference and Partner Choice in a Cooperative Game.

Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz, Maayan Stavans, Barbu Revencu, Kazuhide Hashiya, Hiromi Kobayashi, Gergely Csibra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura Schlingloff-NemeczDepartment of Cognitive Science, Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7512-2617
Maayan StavansDepartment of Cognitive Science, Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-8114
Barbu RevencuDepartment of Cognitive Science, Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.
Kazuhide HashiyaFaculty of Human-Environmental Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiromi KobayashiFaculty of Human-Environmental Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Gergely CsibraDepartment of Cognitive Science, Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 742231Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H04431Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H05591Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H01763Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H04929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of experiments conducted in Central Europe (Hungary, Austria) and East Asia (Japan) probed whether 5- to 10-year-old children (n = 436, 213 female) and adults (n = 71, 43 female; all data collected between July 2020 and May 2023) would infer traits and choose partners accordingly, in a novel touchscreen game. The participants observed third-party actions and interactions of animated agents whose behavior varied in prosociality and skill, and subsequently selected whom to play with in potentially cooperative endeavors. Overall, the results indicate (1) that trait inference may not naturally follow from action understanding but relies on learning and experimental task framing, and (2) that by 7 years of age, children begin to capitalize on such inferences in partner choice.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentChoice BehaviorCooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsPersonalitySocial PerceptionAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansMaleYoung Adultcooperationpartner choicetrait attribution

Identifiers

PMID40219682
PMCPMC12208008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.