ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
End-Of-Life Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Curricula: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to explore end-of-life simulation in undergraduate nursing curricula in Australian and New Zealand institutions.
designA cross-sectional descriptive research design was employed. The study is reported using the CROSS checklist.
methodsA survey was distributed to 45 institutions with an accredited Bachelor of Nursing programme in Australia or New Zealand. The instrument comprised eight domains: simulation orientation, simulator type, simulation environment, instructional design, simulation event, pre-brief, debrief, and facilitation preparation and requirements.
resultsThirty institutions responded to the survey, with 25 suitable for data analysis. Eleven institutions included end-of-life simulation in their curriculum. The dominant modality used in the end-of-life simulation was high-technology manikins. All institutions used a validated approach to conducting the pre-brief and debrief. Variations were reported in the skill and clinical expertise required of end-of-life simulation facilitators and the approaches and modalities used in end-of-life simulations across institutions.
conclusionA small number of institutions reported including end-of-life simulations in their undergraduate nursing curriculum. This study found the end-of-life simulations integrated into undergraduate nursing curricula in Australia and New Zealand align with many elements of the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice. There were variations in the simulation modality and facilitation style used to deliver end-of-life simulations across institutions. While a pre-brief session was included, the elements covered and information conveyed to participants varied across institutions. Additionally, the content expertise required of simulation facilitators lacked clarity. RECOMMENDATION FOR FUTURE RESEARCH: The influence the pre-brief has on the student learning experience requires further research. Moreover, the learning experiences of the participants in various simulation modalities, including the influence of SPs and debriefing approaches, warrant investigation. The role and impact of professional development and facilitator requirements, such as skills and clinical expertise, on the student learning experiences and outcomes in EOL simulation offer opportunities for further research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There were no patient or public contributions in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.