ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025
Verbal Information From Parents About Stillbirth: The VIPS Study (Phase One).
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn many countries, a baby's cause of death (COD) following stillbirth is informed only by case notes and pathology investigations. However, parents' understanding of their baby's COD may inform or even change the COD diagnosis. We aimed to produce a standardised co-designed interview schedule to enable parents to contribute information to improve overall understanding of the causes of stillbirth. MATERIALS AND
methodsConsensus for the interview schedule was sought via a two-round modified Delphi study. We recruited internationally for panel membership comprising bereaved parents, clinicians, and researchers. In Round 1, each panellist provided up to five questions to ask bereaved parents. After collation into categories, Round 2 asked panellists to rate the importance of each question category on a four-point scale.
resultsPanellists (n = 126 Round 1, n = 75 Round 2) were mainly bereaved parents. In Round 1, 553 potential interview questions were generated. These were grouped into categories which were pregnancy experience, antenatal care, fetal wellbeing, maternal wellbeing, days Prior to stillbirth and perceived COD. These proposed questions and question categories were then put to panel members in Round 2. All categories achieved consensus for inclusion in the final interview schedule with positive consensus percentage scores ranging from 83% to 98%.
conclusionsPanel membership comprising mainly bereaved parents provided a clear mandate for questions parents want to be asked. The interview schedule will soon be trialled with recently bereaved parents at a tertiary-referral maternity health service. Findings from the study will inform future research on how to include parents' voices in COD determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.