ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2025
[
Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the filling quality of single cone obturation in root canal model with irregular structure (Hus&Kim Ⅴ, Yin Ⅱ-type isthmus) which established by 3D printing technology using slices and radiographic methods, in order to provide reference for clinical practice.
methods(1) Extracted fresh premolars with Hus&Kim Ⅴ and Yin-type Ⅱ isthmus were collected and scanned by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), then standard root canal models were designed and printed. Rhodamine B staining and bias fitting were used to verify the availability of the models. (2) 30 root canal models were randomly divided into 3 groups according to different filling methods ( CONTROL GROUP: vertical compaction obturation; Experimental group 1: single cone obturation with 0.06-taper cone (30#); Experimental group 2: single cone obturation with 0.04-taper cone (35#), GuttaFlow 2 as canal sealers. Slices were taken at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the root apex in the direction perpendicular to the long axis of the root and observed under a stereomicroscope to calculate the percentage of filling area (PAV), percentage of gutta-percha-filled area (PGFA), percentage of sealer filled area (PSFA). (3) On the basis of the above results, two groups (
results(1) Rhodamine B staining solution could overflow the apical foramen, and the main root canal system and the isthmus area were stained, showed no remnants of support material. The 3D standard deviation of the printed model data was 0.03 mm, and the average fitting distance was 0.02 mm. (2) The PFA of the two experimental groups were both significantly lower than that of the control group (
conclusionIn the irregular root canal structure with isthmus, using large-taper gutta-percha can improve the filling quality of the middle and upper part of the canal, but the percentage of filling volume in the isthmus is lower than that of the main canal, and more technical improvements are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40219571PMC11992436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.