Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40219345›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Quantitative Assessment of Voids' Impact on Mechanical Properties of Standard Dogbone Model Versus End-User Component in Non-Linear Geometry.

Yasaman Mohseni, Sinduja Suresh, Marie-Luise Wille, Prasad K D V Yarlagadda, J Paige Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasaman MohseniSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Sinduja SureshSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0462-7762
Marie-Luise WilleSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4962-7587
Prasad K D V YarlagaddaAustralian Research Council (ARC) Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling and Manufacturing (M3D Innovation), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-4795
J Paige LittleSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-5343

Funding

Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centres (ARC ITTC) for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing (M3D Innovation) [IC180100008]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers advantages such as design flexibility and reduced production times, but defects like voids impact mechanical performance and limit its broader adoption. This study quantitatively examines the relationship between void characteristics (volume fraction, distribution, and size) and mechanical properties in both linear and non-linear geometries, represented by a dogbone model and an end-use component, respectively. Samples were produced using Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) with varying overlap levels to control void content. As the overlap increased from 0% to 99%, voids transitioned from large linear gaps to smaller point-shaped voids. In non-linear geometry, void reduction from 12% to 2% led to a threefold improvement in mechanical response, while in dogbone samples, voids decreased from 12% to nearly 0%, improving the elastic modulus by only 1.5 times. This disparity is due to differences in void distribution, as voids in non-linear geometries affect both margins and internal layers, significantly influencing structural integrity. The findings highlight the importance of the void location in determining mechanical performance and emphasize the limitations of using linear dogbone models to assess void-property relationships in complex 3D-printed structures.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingFused Filament Fabrication techniquemanufacturing defects (voids)mechanical propertiespolymerstandard dogbone model versus end-user component

Identifiers

PMID40219345
PMCPMC11991377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.