ArticlePolymers2025
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Interfacial Effects in PBT-Based Azide Propellants Under Tensile Deformation.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical properties of PBT-based azide propellants, composed of a 3,3'-bis(azidomethyl)oxetane/tetrahydrofuran (PBT) copolymer matrix and defective ammonium perchlorate (AP) crystals, are significantly influenced by the matrix-crystal interface. This study employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine interfacial effects on mechanical performance under uniaxial tensile deformation. Models with varying cross-linking densities (70%, 80%, 90%) and AP defect widths (20 Å, 30 Å, 40 Å) were analyzed to assess the effects of temperature, strain rate, cross-linking degree, and defect size on interfacial adhesion strength and failure mechanisms. Results indicate that at low temperatures, the interface exhibited high stress peaks and brittleness characteristics, transitioning to plastic flow and enhanced ductility at higher temperatures. Cross-linking density significantly affects interfacial strength: a 90% cross-linking degree achieved the highest stress peak and optimal tensile resistance, whereas lower cross-linking resulted in weaker stress transfer and accelerated post-peak stress decay. Higher strain rates increased peak stress and shortened deformation times, while lower strain rates promoted molecular rearrangement, enhancing tensile resistance. Defect size also plays a crucial role, with smaller defects maintaining interfacial dominance, whereas larger defects shift failure toward the bulk matrix, reducing stress transfer efficiency. These findings provide atomic-scale insights into interfacial defects and key material parameters, offering theoretical guidance for optimizing the structural stability of composite propellants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.