ArticlePolymers2025
Biodegradable Polymer Composites Based on Poly(butylene succinate) Copolyesters and Wood Flour.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the biodegradation behavior of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) copolyesters containing dilinoleic acid (DLA) co-monomeric units and wood flour (WF) as a filler. PBS-DLA is a segmented thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), where the soft amorphous phase is formed by DLA ester segments, while the hard phase consists of crystallizable PBS domains. Wood-plastic composites (WPCs) were prepared with WF at weight fractions of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% wt. and analyzed in terms of surface morphology, chemical structure, mechanical performance, and thermal stability before and after biodegradation in soil conditions. The results of microscopic analysis confirmed that the PBS-DLA copolymer and its composites undergo surface biodegradation as manifested by increased surface roughness and microcrack formation, particularly in composites with a higher WF content. ATR FT-IR spectroscopy indicated oxidation and hydrolysis, supporting the hypothesis of progressive surface erosion. Mechanical tests showed a decline in tensile strength and elongation at break, with the most pronounced changes in composites containing 20% WF. Thermal analysis (DSC, DMTA, and TGA) confirmed that the PBS-DLA copolymer retains its thermoplastic elastomeric behavior after a 3-month biodegradation experiment. The storage modulus (E') remained stable, while only minor variations in melting and crystallization temperatures were observed. These findings reinforce the hypothesis of surface erosion rather than a bulk degradation mechanism. Given their biodegradability and retained thermoplastic behavior, WPC composites based on PBS-DLA copolyester could be promising for eco-friendly applications where controlled degradation is desirable, such as in packaging, agriculture, or biodegradable consumer goods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.