ArticlePolymers2025
3D-Printed Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite Bionic Scaffold for Bone Regeneration.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Vancomycin- and Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Grafts for Osteomyelitis Treatment: Drug Release and Antibacterial Efficacy.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Osteoinductive and Biocompatibility Assessment of a 3D-Printed Polymeric-Hydroxyapatite Composite Interference Screw.Polymers · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed PLA/HA Composite Scaffolds: Balancing Mechanical Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Implant Surface Characteristics and Peri-Implant Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Microbiological Evidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- IL-4/Nanohydroxyapatite Codelivery in a Dual-Bionic Scaffold: Design and Immunomodulatory Endogenous Osteogenesis Mechanism.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Biocompatible Thermoplastics in Additive Manufacturing of Bone Defect Fillers: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The limitations of traditional, autologous bone grafts, such as the scarcity of donor material and the risks of secondary surgical trauma, have spurred the development of alternatives for the repair of large bone defects. Bionic bone scaffolds fabricated via fused deposition modeling (FDM)-a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique-are considered promising. While gyroid-structured scaffolds mimic the complex micro-architecture of cancellous bone, their application in FDM 3D printing remains understudied. Furthermore, no consensus has been reached on the ideal pore size for gyroid scaffolds, which is influenced by the infill density. In this study, we fabricated five groups of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA) scaffolds with different infill densities (40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, and 60%) using a solvent-free filament preparation method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation showed that all scaffolds exhibit an interconnected porous structure. The scaffold with the 55% infill density, featuring a pore size of 465 ± 63 μm, demonstrated optimal hydrophilicity and mechanical properties comparable to natural cancellous bone. In addition, this scaffold supported cellular bridging within its pores and showed the highest alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and calcium salt deposition. Our findings offer novel insights into the design of gyroid-like scaffolds and their fabrication via FDM, paving the way for potential clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.