Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40219243›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Optimization Scheme for 3D Printing of PLA-PHBV-PCL Biodegradable Blends for Use in Orthopedic Casting.

Muhammad Mohid Aziz, Logan Beard, Shafahat Ali, Abdelkrem Eltaggaz, Ibrahim Deiab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Mohid AzizAdvanced Manufacturing Lab (AML), School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Logan BeardAdvanced Manufacturing Lab (AML), School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Shafahat AliAdvanced Manufacturing Lab (AML), School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-6396
Abdelkrem EltaggazAdvanced Manufacturing Lab (AML), School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-6386
Ibrahim DeiabAdvanced Manufacturing Lab (AML), School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0596-3802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing technology offers significant advantages in the production of orthopedic casts, providing a promising alternative to conventional plaster and fiberglass materials. Polylactic acid (PLA) is widely used for this purpose; however, its adoption is limited due to poor mechanical properties, including high brittleness, low thermal stability, and limited elongation. These challenges can be mitigated by blending PLA with other biodegradable polymers. This study investigated a blend of PLA with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), a type of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), and polycaprolactone (PCL) for the development of 3D printed orthopedic casts. The key mechanical properties-tensile strength, percent elongation at break, Young's modulus, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and impact strength-were evaluated as a function of the printing parameters, including nozzle temperature, layer height, and raster angle. The grey relational analysis (GRA) approach was applied to optimize these mechanical properties. The optimal printing parameters were found to be a nozzle temperature of 180 °C, a layer height of 0.18 mm, and a raster angle of 0°, resulting in a tensile strength of 44.4 ± 4.4 MPa, an elongation at break of 68.5 ± 11.6%, a Young's modulus of 948.7 ± 25.1 MPa, a flexural strength of 54.6 ± 8.9 MPa, a flexural modulus of 1549.3 ± 141 MPa, and an impact strength of 80.77 ± 5.6 J/m. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that for tensile strength, 50.18% was influenced by the raster angle, 26.38% by the layer height, and 18.92% by the nozzle temperature; for flexural strength, 69.81% was influenced by the raster angle, 20.67% by the layer height, and 3.53% by the nozzle temperature; and for impact strength, 75.11% was influenced by the raster angle, 13.16% by the layer height, and 4.45% by the nozzle temperature.

Indexed as

3D printingbioplasticsoptimizationorthopedic casting

Identifiers

PMID40219243
PMCPMC11991175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.