ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vase-Life Monitoring System for Cut Flowers Using Deep Learning and Multiple Cameras.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we developed a vase-life monitoring system (VMS) to automatically and accurately assess the post-harvest quality and vase life (VL) of cut roses. The VMS integrates camera imaging with the YOLOv8 (You Only Look Once version 8) deep learning algorithm to continuously monitor major physiological parameters including flower opening, fresh weight, water uptake, and gray mold disease incidence. Our results showed that the VMS can automatically measure the main physiological factors of cut roses by obtaining precise and consistent data. The values measured for physiology and disease by the VMS closely correlated with those measured by observation (OBS). Additionally, YOLOv8 achieved a high performance in the model by obtaining an object detection accuracy of 90%. Additionally, the mAP0.5 supported the high accuracy of the model in evaluating the VL of cut roses. Regression analysis revealed a strong correlation between the VL, VMS, and OBS. The VMS incorporating the microscope detected physiological and disease factors in the early stages of development. These results show that the plant monitoring system incorporating a microscope is highly effective for evaluating the post-harvest quality of cut roses. The early detection method using the VMS could also be applied to the flower breeding process, which requires rapid measurements of important characteristics of flower species, such as VL and disease resistance, to develop superior cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.