ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Lunar Soil Simulant for Plant Cultivation: Earthworm-Mediated Organic Waste Integration and Plant-Microbe Interactions.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Microbial Fertilizers on the Properties of Simulated Lunar Soil and Lettuce Growth.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term human residence on the Moon is an inevitable trend in lunar exploration, necessitating the development of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSSs). In BLSSs, plant cultivation serves as the core functional unit, requiring substantial amounts of cultivation substrates. Lunar soil has potential as a cultivation substrate, but its suitability for plant growth must be improved to meet life-support requirements. As a fine-grained, organics-free, in situ resource, lunar soil's high compaction significantly restricts crops' root access to oxygen, water, and nutrients. While the addition of organic solid waste-a byproduct of BLSSs-could alleviate compaction, issues such as salinization, incomplete decomposition, and the presence of pathogens pose risks to crop health. In this study, we introduced earthworms into wheat cultivation systems to gradually digest, transfer (as vermicompost), and mix solid waste with a lunar soil simulant substrate. We set five experimental groups: a positive control group using vermiculite (named as V) as the optimal growth substrate, a negative control group using pure lunar soil simulant (LS), and three treatment groups using lunar soil simulant with solid waste and 15 (LS+15ew), 30 (LS+30ew), and 45 (LS+45ew) earthworms added. Our results demonstrated significant improvements in both compaction (e.g., bulk density, hydraulic conductivity) and salinization (e.g., salinity, electrical conductivity), likely due to the improved soil aggregate structures, which increased the porosity and ion adsorption capacity of the soil. Additionally, the microbial community within the substrate shifted toward a cooperative pattern dominated by significantly enriched plant probiotics. Consequently, the cultivated wheat achieved approximately 80% of the growth parameters (including production) compared to the control group grown in vermiculite with nutrient solution (representing ideal cultivation conditions), indicating sufficient nutrient supply from the mineralized waste. We can conclude that the earthworms "complementarily" improved the lunar soil simulant and organic waste by addressing compaction and salinization, respectively, leading to comprehensive improvements in key parameters, including the microbial environment. This study proposes a conceptual framework for improving lunar soil for crop cultivation, and it innovatively introduces earthworms as a preliminary yet effective solution. These findings provide a feasible and inspiring foundation for future lunar agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.