Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218986›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2025

Probiotic Supplements Effect on Feeding Tolerance, Growth and Neonatal Morbidity in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sofia Söderquist Kruth, Emma Persad, Alexander Rakow

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early supplementation with live combinedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  8. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Probiotic biogeography and sepsis prevention in the neonatal intestine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sofia Söderquist KruthDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma PersadDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander RakowDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesProbiotic supplementation has been actively investigated in preterm populations to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis. Despite this, few studies have focused on clinically relevant feeding tolerance and growth outcomes, and there is an alarming lack of evidence surrounding extremely preterm infants (defined as birth before 28 weeks gestational age), those most at risk of severe comorbidities. We aimed to investigate whether probiotics improve feeding tolerance, neonatal growth and neonatal morbidity among extremely preterm infants.

methodsA literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing trials. We included extremely preterm infants from randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials with a concurrent control group. Two authors independently performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Risk of Bias 2 tool from Cochrane. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

resultsEleven RCTs and three non-randomized studies with a concurrent control group were included, analyzing a total of 14,888 extremely preterm infants. Meta-analyses revealed lower mean days to full enteral feeds (mean difference 1.1 days lower; 95% CI, 7.83 lower to 5.56 higher) and lower duration of parenteral nutrition (mean difference 2.4 days lower; 95% CI, 7.44 lower to 2.58 higher) in infants treated with probiotics; however, this was not statistically significant. There was a significant reduction in NEC (RR; 0.80, 95% CI; 0.68, 0.93) and all-cause mortality (RR; 0.56, 95% CI; 0.33, 0.93) in the probiotic group. All outcomes were graded at low or very low certainty of evidence.

conclusionsThe findings indicate a trend towards a potential beneficial effect of probiotic supplementation in reducing feeding intolerance and a notable reduction of risk of NEC and all-cause mortality in infants receiving probiotics. Future RCTs will focus on feeding intolerance, and growth outcomes are warranted.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfant, Extremely PrematureProbioticsEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaParenteral NutritionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicextreme prematurityfeeding tolerancegrowthnecrotizing enterocolitisprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID40218986
PMCPMC11990243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.