ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Robust EEG Characteristics for Predicting Neurological Recovery from Coma After Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning based depth of anaesthesia monitoring using EEG: a 4-layer CNN model with PSD and BSR correlation features.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Ambient Music Decreases EEG Burst-Suppression Ratio During General Anesthesia in Rats.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinically, patients in a coma after cardiac arrest are given the prognosis of "neurological recovery" to minimize discrepancies in opinions and reduce judgment errors. This study aimed to analyze the background patterns of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals from such patients to identify the key indicators for assessing the prognosis after coma. APPROACH: Standard machine learning models were applied sequentially as feature selectors and filters. CatBoost demonstrated superior performance as a classification method compared to other approaches. In addition, Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were utilized to rank and analyze the importance of the features.
resultsOur results indicated that the three different EEG features helped achieve a fivefold cross-validation receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) of 0.87. Our evaluation revealed that functional connectivity features contribute the most to classification at 70%. Among these, low-frequency long-distance functional connectivity (45%) was associated with a poor prognosis, whereas high-frequency short-distance functional connectivity (25%) was linked with a good prognosis. Burst suppression ratio is 20%, concentrated in the left frontal-temporal and right occipital-temporal regions at high thresholds (10/15 mV), demonstrating its strong discriminative power. SIGNIFICANCE: Our research identifies key electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarkers, including low-frequency connectivity and burst suppression thresholds, to improve early and objective prognosis assessments. By integrating machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as Gradient Boosting Models and Support Vector Machines, with SHAP-based feature visualization, robust screening methods were applied to ensure the reliability of predictions. These findings provide a clinically actionable framework for advancing neurological prognosis and optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.