ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of a testing framework for various indoor positioning technologies brings huge challenges to the systematic and fair evaluation of positioning systems, which greatly hinders the development and industrialization of indoor positioning technology. In order to solve this problem, this article refers to international standards, such as ISO/IEC 18305, and uses the China Electronics Standardization Institute's rich experience in indoor positioning technology research and testing to build a universal positioning performance testing and evaluation framework. First, this paper introduces the experimental environment in detail from the aspects of the coordinate system definition, test point selection, building type definition, motion mode definition, and motion trajectory setting. Then, this paper comprehensively measures performance evaluation indicators from dimensions such as the accuracy index, relative accuracy, startup time, fault tolerance, power consumption, size, and cost. Finally, this paper elaborates on the testing methods and processes of positioning precision, accuracy, relative accuracy, floor identification, indoor-outdoor distinction, latency, relative accuracy, success rate, and movement speed tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.