ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comparative Study and Optimization of Camera-Based BEV Segmentation for Real-Time Autonomous Driving.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the optimization of a camera-based bird's eye view (BEV) segmentation technique that operates in real-time within an embedded system environment while maintaining high accuracy despite limited computational resources. Specifically, it examines three technical approaches for BEV segmentation in autonomous driving: depth-based methods, MLP-based methods, and transformer-based methods, focusing on key techniques such as lift-splat-shoot, HDMapNet, and BEVFormer. A mathematical analysis of these methods is conducted, followed by a comparative performance evaluation using the nuScenes dataset. The optimization process was carried out in three stages: accuracy improvement, latency reduction, and model size optimization. In the first stage of the process, the three modules for BEV segmentation (encoder, view transformation, and decoder) were selected with the goal of maximizing mIoU performance. In the second stage, environmental variable optimization was performed through input resolution adaptation and data augmentation to improve accuracy. Finally, in the third stage, model compression was applied to minimize model size and latency for efficient deployment on embedded systems. Experimental results from the first stage show that the lift-splat-shoot view transformation model, based on the InternImage-B encoder and EfficientNet-B0 decoder, achieved the highest performance with 54.9 mIoU at an input image size of 448×800. Notably, the lift-splat-shoot view transformation model with the InternImage-T encoder and EfficientNet-B0 decoder demonstrated performance of 53.1 mIoU while achieving high efficiency (51.7 ms and 159.5 MB, respectively). The application of the second stage revealed that increasing the input resolution does not always lead to improved accuracy, and there is an optimal resolution size depending on the model. In this study, the best performance was achieved with an input image size of 448×800. During the third stage, FP16 quantization enabled a 50% reduction in memory size and decreased latency while maintaining similar or identical mIoU performance. When deployed on the NVIDIA AGX Orin device, which operates under power constraints, energy efficiency improved, although it resulted in higher latency under certain power supply conditions. As a result, the InternImage encoder-based lift-splat-shoot technique was shown to achieve the highest accuracy performance relative to latency and model size. This approach outperformed the original method by achieving a 29.2% higher mIoU while maintaining similar latency performance and reducing memory size by 32.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.