ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An End-to-End General Language Model (GLM)-4-Based Milling Cutter Fault Diagnosis Framework for Intelligent Manufacturing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CNC machine and cutting tools are an indispensable part of the cutting process. Their life default diagnosis is related to the efficiency of the entire production process, which ultimately impacts economic performance. Many methods provided by deep learning articles have been verified for use on large cutting datasets and can help in diagnosing tools' lifetime well; however, on small samples, the challenge of learning difficulties still emerges. The rise in large language models (LLMs) has brought changes to tool life diagnosis. This study proposes a fault diagnosis algorithm based on GLM-4, and the experimental validation on the PHM 2010 dataset and a proprietary milling cutter dataset demonstrates the superiority of the proposed model, achieving diagnostic accuracies of 93.8% and 93.3%, respectively, outperforming traditional models (SVM, CNN, RNN) and baseline LLMs (ChatGLM2-6B variants). Further robustness and noise-resistance analyses confirm its stability under varying SNR levels (10 dB to -10 dB) and limited training samples. This work highlights the potential of integrating domain-specific feature engineering with LLMs to advance intelligent manufacturing diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.