ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Explainable LSTM-Based Intrusion Detection System Optimized by Firefly Algorithm for IoT Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor-Driven Deep Learning for Smart Home Intelligence: Signal Analysis, Multimodal Perception, and System-Level Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Graph Convolution Neural Network and Deep Q-Network Optimization-Based Intrusion Detection with Explainability Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HED-ID: an edge-deployable and explainable intrusion detection system optimized via metaheuristic learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance Analysis of Explainable Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Networks: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recurrent Neural Networks with Integrated Gradients Explanation for Predicting the Hysteresis Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As more IoT devices become connected to the Internet, the attack surface for cybercrimes expands, leading to significant security concerns for these devices. Existing intrusion detection systems (IDSs) designed to address these concerns often suffer from high rates of false positives and missed threats due to the presence of redundant and irrelevant information for the IDSs. Furthermore, recent IDSs that utilize artificial intelligence are often presented as black boxes, offering no explanation of their internal operations. In this study, we develop a solution to the identified challenges by presenting a deep learning-based model that adapts to new attacks by selecting only the relevant information as inputs and providing transparent internal operations for easy understanding and adoption by cybersecurity personnel. Specifically, we employ a hybrid approach using statistical methods and a metaheuristic algorithm for feature selection to identify the most relevant features and limit the overall feature set while building an LSTM-based model for intrusion detection. To this end, we utilize two publicly available datasets, NF-BoT-IoT-v2 and IoTID20, for training and testing. The results demonstrate an accuracy of 98.42% and 89.54% for the NF-BoT-IoT-v2 and IoTID20 datasets, respectively. The performance of the proposed model is compared with that of other machine learning models and existing state-of-the-art models, demonstrating superior accuracy. To explain the proposed model's predictions and increase trust in its outcomes, we applied two explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools: Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), providing valuable insights into the model's behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.