ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reinforcement Learning Approach to Optimizing Profilometric Sensor Trajectories for Surface Inspection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Optical Metrology and Perception Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reinforcement Learning Approach to Optimizing Profilometric Sensor Trajectories for Surface Inspection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-precision surface defect detection in manufacturing often relies on laser triangulation profilometric sensors for detailed surface measurements, providing detailed and accurate surface measurements over a line. Accurate motion between the sensor and workpiece, usually managed by robotic systems, is critical for maintaining optimal distance and orientation. This paper introduces a novel Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach to optimize inspection trajectories for profilometric sensors based on the boustrophedon scanning method. The RL model dynamically adjusts sensor position and tilt to ensure consistent profile distribution and high-quality scanning. We use a simulated environment replicating real-world conditions, including sensor noise and surface irregularities, to plan trajectories offline using CAD models. Key contributions include designing a state space, action space, and reward function tailored for profilometric sensor inspection. The Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm trains the RL agent to optimize these trajectories effectively. Validation involves testing the model on various parts in simulation and performing real-world inspection with a UR3e robotic arm, demonstrating the approach's practicality and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.