ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Respiratory Rate Sensing for a Non-Stationary Human Assisted by Motion Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-contact human respiration rate monitoring can be used for sleep apnea detection and home care. Typically, the human body does not remain stationary for long periods, and body movement can significantly affect the performance of non-contact respiratory monitoring. Because the breathing rate generally remains stable over short periods, using measurements from only a portion of the radar echo signals does not result in significant errors, and these errors will be smaller than those caused by body movement. However, selecting a window size that is too short reduces frequency resolution, leading to increased estimation errors. Choosing an appropriate window length can improve estimation accuracy. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to determine whether the subject is stationary and select the received signal with minimal body movement. Experimental results are compared using alternative schemes, including fast Fourier transform (FFT), short-time Fourier transform (STFT), and RGB-D camera-assisted methods, in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.