ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
IESSP: Information Extraction-Based Sparse Stripe Pruning Method for Deep Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Network pruning is a deep learning model compression technique aimed at reducing model storage requirements and decreasing computational resource consumption. However, mainstream pruning techniques often encounter challenges such as limited precision in feature selection and a diminished feature extraction capability. To address these issues, we propose an information extraction-based sparse stripe pruning (IESSP) method. This method introduces an information extraction module (IEM), which enhances stripe selection through a mask-based mechanism, promoting inter-layer interactions and directing the network's focus toward key features. In addition, we design a novel loss function that links output loss to stripe selection, enabling an effective balance between accuracy and efficiency. This loss function also supports the adaptive optimization of stripe sparsity during training. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing techniques. Specifically, when applied to prune the VGG-16 model on the CIFAR-10 dataset, the proposed method achieves a 0.29% improvement in accuracy while reducing FLOPs by 75.88% compared to the baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.