ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
EEG Signal Prediction for Motor Imagery Classification in Brain-Computer Interfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A motor imagery decoding study integrating differential attention with a multi-scale adaptive temporal convolutional network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- Motor Imagery Acquisition Paradigms: In the Search to Improve Classification Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of EEG Electrode Numbers on Source Estimation in Motor Imagery.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on motor imagery (MI) generally require EEG signals recorded from a large number of electrodes distributed across the cranial surface to achieve accurate MI classification. Not only does this entail long preparation times and high costs, but it also carries the risk of losing valuable information when an electrode is damaged, further limiting its practical applicability. In this study, a signal prediction-based method is proposed to achieve high accuracy in MI classification using EEG signals recorded from only a small number of electrodes. The signal prediction model was constructed using the elastic net regression technique, allowing for the estimation of EEG signals from 22 complete channels based on just 8 centrally located channels. The predicted EEG signals from the complete channels were used for feature extraction and MI classification. The results obtained indicate a notable efficacy of the proposed prediction method, showing an average performance of 78.16% in classification accuracy. The proposed method demonstrated superior performance compared to the traditional approach that used few-channel EEG and also achieved better results than the traditional method based on full-channel EEG. Although accuracy varies among subjects, from 62.30% to an impressive 95.24%, these data indicate the capability of the method to provide accurate estimates from a reduced set of electrodes. This performance highlights its potential to be implemented in practical MI-based BCI applications, thereby mitigating the time and cost constraints associated with systems that require a high density of electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.