ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ethics of Sensor-Based Surveillance of People with Dementia in Clinical Practice.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensor-based surveillance technology (SST) is increasingly employed in the care of people with dementia (PwD) in hospitals, nursing homes, and home care. With improved functionality and availability of SST, there will likely be a growing utilization in clinical settings. In the context of staff shortage, the expected resource-efficient safety benefits are attractive but must be critically balanced against concerns that basic ethical principles are violated. In this discussion paper, we provide a brief overview of frequently used SST and discuss ethical issues associated with their use. We identify intrusion into privacy and the complex interaction between stakeholders as the biggest challenges. Moreover, the frequent lack of decision-making capacity in PwD poses particular ethical challenges. Evidence concerning safety benefits exists mostly for the detection of patients leaving the intended area (i.e., getting up, leaving the premises) or occurring falls. The level of privacy intrusion to detect occurring falls varies widely between different sensor systems. Finally, we propose best practice recommendations for the clinical implementation of SST in the care of PwD, and we address the circumstances under which the use of sensors can be ethically justified despite the absence of legally valid informed consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.