SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Technological Advancements in Human Navigation for the Visually Impaired: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Camera Configuration for Wearable Electronic Travel Aids Supporting Urban Mobility of Visually Impaired People.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indoor Navigation for People With Visual Impairment in Canada: Participatory Co-Design and Interdisciplinary Study of the Edge A-Eye Platform.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Vision Restoration to People with Long-Term Blindness Using the Brain-Computer Interface Technology: A Sociotechnical Research Framework to Improve Usefulness for Users.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visually impaired people face significant obstacles when navigating complex environments. However, recent technological advances have greatly improved the functionality of navigation systems tailored to their needs. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness and functionality these navigation systems through a comparative analysis of recent technologies. For this purpose, the PRISMA 2020 methodology was used to perform a systematic literature review. After identification and screening, 58 articles published between 2019 and 2024 were selected from three academic databases: Dimensions (26 articles), Web of Science (18 articles), and Scopus (14 articles). Bibliometric analysis demonstrated a growing interest of the research community in the topic, with an average of 4.552 citations per published article. Even with the technological advances that have occurred in recent times, there is still a significant gap in the support systems for people with blindness due to the lack of digital accessibility and the scarcity of adapted support systems. This situation limits the autonomy and inclusion of people with blindness, so the need to continue developing technological and social solutions to ensure equal opportunities and full participation in society is evident. This study emphasizes the great advances with the integration of sensors such as high-precision GPS, ultrasonic sensors, Bluetooth, and various assistance apps for object recognition, obstacle detection, and trajectory generation, as well as haptic systems, which provide tactile information through wearables or actuators and improve spatial awareness. Current navigation algorithms were also identified in the review with methods including obstacle detection, path planning, and trajectory prediction, applied to technologies such as ultrasonic sensors, RGB-D cameras, and LiDAR for indoor navigation, as well as stereo cameras and GPS for outdoor navigation. It was also found that AI systems employ deep learning and neural networks to optimize both navigation accuracy and energy efficiency. Finally, analysis revealed that 79% of the 58 reviewed articles included experimental validation, 87% of which were on haptic systems and 40% on smartphones. These results underscore the importance of experimentation in the development of technologies for the mobility of people with visual impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.