ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Chemical Nose-Based Non-Invasive Detection of Breast Cancer Using Exhaled Breath.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly occurring cancer in women and one of the leading causes of cancer death in women worldwide. BC mortality is related to early tumor detection, highlighting the importance of early detection methods. This work aims to develop a robust, accurate and highly reliable, non-invasive, low-cost screening method for early detection of BC in routine screening using exhaled breath (EB) analysis. For this, exhaled breath samples were collected from 267 women: 131 breast cancer patients and 136 healthy women. After collection, the samples were measured using a commercially available electronic nose. The signals obtained for each sample were first processed and then went through a feature extraction step. An SVM model was then optimized with respect to the accuracy matrix using a validation set by applying a Monte Carlo cross-validation with 100 iterations, with each iteration containing 20% of the data. The validation set results were 80, 94, 88, and 95% for recall, precision, accuracy, and specificity, correspondingly. Once model optimization had concluded, 22 unknown samples were analyzed by the model, and an accuracy, precision, and specificity of 91% was achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.