ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Low-Cost Multi-Spectral Sensors for Measuring Chlorophyll Levels Across Diverse Leaf Types.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable Multispectral Optoelectronic System for Thyroid Cancer Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Portable Multispectral Fluorometer with Embedded Machine Learning for Chlorophyll-a Estimation in Acetone-Extracted Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- An algorithm for effectively separating overlapping spectra of chlorophyll a and b inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlorophyll levels are a key indicator of plant nitrogen status, which plays a critical role in optimizing agricultural yields. This study evaluated the performance of three low-cost multi-spectral sensors, AS7262, AS7263, and AS7265x, for non-destructive chlorophyll measurement. Measurements were taken from a diverse set of five leaf types, including smooth, uniform leaves (banana and mango), textured leaves (jasmine and sugarcane), and narrow leaves (rice). Partial least squares regression models were used to fit sensor spectra to chlorophyll levels, using nested cross-validation to ensure robust model evaluation. Sensor performance was assessed using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) scores. The AS7265x demonstrated the best performance on smooth, uniform leaves with validation R2 scores of 0.96-0.95. Its performance decreased for the other leaves, with R2 scores of 0.75-0.85. The AS7262 and AS7263 sensors, while slightly less accurate, achieved reasonable R2 scores ranging from 0.93 to 0.86 for smooth leaves, and from 0.85 to 0.73 for the other leaves. All sensors, particularly the AS7265x, show potential for non-destructive chlorophyll measurement in agricultural applications. Their low cost and reasonable accuracy make them suitable for agricultural applications such as monitoring plant nitrogen levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.