ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Adapting Young Adults' In-Shoe Motion Sensor Gait Models for Knee Evaluation in Older Adults: A Study on Osteoarthritis and Healthy Knees.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human knee joint is crucial for mobility, especially in older adults who are susceptible to conditions like osteoarthritis (OA). Traditionally, assessing knee health requires complex gait analysis in clinical settings, which limits opportunities for convenient and continuous monitoring. This study leverages advancements in wearable technology to explore the adaptation of models based on in-shoe motion sensors (IMS), initially trained on young adults, for evaluating knee function in older populations, both healthy and with OA. Data were collected from 44 older OA patients, presenting various levels of severity, and 20 healthy older adults, with a focus on key knee indicators: knee angle measures (S1 to S3), temporal gait parameters (S4 and S5), and knee angular jerk cost metrics (S6 to S8). The models effectively identified trends and differences across these indicators between the healthy group and the OA group. Notably, in indicators S1, S2, S3, S7, and S8, the models exhibited a large effect size in correlation with true values. These findings suggest that gait models derived from younger, healthy individuals are possible to be robustly adapted for non-invasive, everyday monitoring of knee health in older adults, offering valuable insights for the early detection and management of knee impairments. However, limitations such as fixed biases due to differences in measurement systems and sensor placement inaccuracies were identified. Future research will aim to enhance model precision by addressing these limitations through domain adaptation techniques and improved sensor calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.