ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
EBTM: An Enumeration-Based Thresholding Method for Degraded Circular Dot Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circular dots are widely used in various measurement applications due to their inherent symmetry, ease of detection, and scalability. However, when degraded by factors such as specular highlights, low contrast, strong noise, or friction damage, accurately extracting them from the background becomes a significant challenge. To address this issue, an enumeration-based thresholding method (EBTM) is proposed for degraded circular dot segmentation. Firstly, a series of candidate outputs are generated using an enumeration-based thresholding scheme. Next, an assessment criterion is developed to evaluate these candidate outputs. Finally, the optimal segments are selected from each candidate output and combined to produce a reasonable thresholding result. Unlike traditional methods, the novel approach does not focus on selecting the optimal threshold values, but instead aims to choose the best segments to produce the desired output. Owing to the enumeration-based thresholding mechanism, the novel approach demonstrates greater robustness in handling the challenges in degraded circular dot images. Extensive comparative studies demonstrate the superiority of the novel approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.