ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Novel Mathematical Approach to Gait Analysis: The Reliability and Validity of the ZAY Angle for Step Length Estimation in Healthy Adults.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: The application of a mathematical formula to human gait at certain phases is a considerable method to avoid the issues associated with complicated procedures of gait assessment. The purpose of this study was to identify the validity and reliability of an angle (the ZAY angle) in estimating and predicting the step length in healthy subjects. (2) Methods: Thirty-three college-aged students participated in this study. For an assessment of each participant's gait, a 4.5 m walkway was covered with a weight paper roll to mark the participant's footprints, providing the step lengths of six consecutive steps for two trials. At the same time, a video recording was captured and analyzed by the Coach's Eye application to determine the step angle (ß). The arc length formula was utilized to calculate the ZAY angle (θ). Spearman's rho correlation coefficient and the interclass correlation coefficient were used to test the validity and reliability of the ZAY angle in determining individualized step lengths in healthy subjects. Simple linear regression was used to test if the calculated angle could significantly predict the step length. (3) Results: The Spearman rho correlation between the analyzed and calculated angles was significant for all three step lengths (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.